Quotes by researchers & other people

'' The current 'Internet of PCs' will move, of course, toward an 'Internet of Things' - of devices of all types -
50 to 100 billion of which will be connected to the internet by 2020. As you know, whereas machines in the 19th century
learned to do, and those in the 20th century learned to think at a rudimentary level, in the 21st century, they are learning
to percieve - to actually sense and respond. Key applications developed by our In-Q-Tel investment companies are focused on
technologies that are driving the 'Internet of Things'.

..Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as radio-frequency
identifikation, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvesters - all connected to the next-generation Internet using
abundant, low cost, and higher power computing - the latter now going to cloud computing, in many areas greater and greater
supercomputing, and, ultimatley, heading to quantum computing.
In practice, these technologies could lead to rapid integration of data from closed societies and provide near-continuous,
persistent monitoring of virtually anywhere we choose.
'Transformational' is an overused word, but I do believe it properly applies to these technologies,
paricularly to their affect on clandestine tradecraft.
Taken together, these developments change our notions of secrecy and create innumerable challenges - as well as opportunities

- David Petraeus (Former CIA Director)

''During the 1950s & 1960s during the Cold War, it was realised by accident that microwaves
could be used as stealth weapons when the Russians beamed the American embassy during
the Cold War and it gave everybody working in the embassy cancer, breast cancer, leukaemia
whatever, and it was realised then that low level microwaves were the perfect stealth weapon
to be used on dissident groups around the world, because you could make dissident groups
sick, give them cancer, change their mental outlook on life without them even knowing they
were being radiated.

The electromagnetic spectrum is a band that goes from gamma rays and x-rays at one end,
the very high energy waves, and it comes down through visible light, which is also some radiation,
and then it goes through infrared microwaves, TV and radio. Now the only ones which really
affect us in the communications industry are the microwaves, and microwaves have a special
ability to interfere with water, which is how microwave ovens work, and we are made of water.
All of our chemical and electrical signals involve water in the body, somehow, electrical
communication in the body. So, the industry has picked the worst possible part of
the electromagentic spectrum to give to young children and to adults.''


- Barrie Trower, a retired British Military Intelligence Scientist.

Gareth icke said something very true some days ago.. in relation to recent happenings between the west and russia;

'Anyone that thinks our government(Britain) wouldn't gooseneck us into war, haven't been paying attention. This is a government that fines homeless people for begging, and 'loses' hundreds of files of evidence on their own paedophiles. They don't give a fuck about the people.'

I would say the same thing about 'my' country (Sweden).

' The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society.
Such a society would be dominated by an Elite, unrestrained by traditional values.
Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuos surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. '

| - Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote that almost 50 years ago, when NO ONE had heard of a fucking Smartphone or anything like we have today.

'' Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power
of our country. We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized..
In almost every act of our lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking,
we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons.. who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world. ''

- | Edward Bernays (1891-1995) the Rothschild Zionist 'Father of Public Relations'

Here's a bumper sticker I'd like to see; We are proud parents of a child who has resisted his teachers´ attempts to break his spirit and bend him
to the will of his corporate masters.
-| George Carlin

Knowledge has no capacity to dispel ignorance. Kowledge is a false phenomenon. It is not wisdom at all; it is just the opposite of wisdom.
Knowledge is borrowed ; wisdom is the flowering of your innermost being ... No university can offer it , no scripture can offer it and no
scholarship is capable of doing it. They are all impotent efforts, but they have been decieving millions of people for thousands of years. Yes they make you
knowledgeable. To be knowledgeable is one thing, to KNOW is totally different.
-| Osho

Media: Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance;
Schools: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law, and real history; Entertainment: Keep the public
entertainment below a sixth-grade level; Work: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on the farm with
the other animals.

| - Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

www.stopthecrime.net/docs/SILENT%20WEAPONS%20for%20QUIET%20WARS.pdf

I can't believe this.. Durham Police, Britain - has become the first in Europe to use Artificial Intelligence to assess whether those arrested are a danger of reoffending if released - They claim that AI doesn't make the final assessment and is only a 'tool' for Police...
This is what Richard Atkinson, a member of the Law Society's Criminal Law Committe said about this:

'' This is a very dangerous step. By law, custody decisions must be made by human beings, taking complex circumstances into account but, in reality, custody sergeants will delegate responsibility to the algorithm. They will undoubtedly face questions from higher up if they choose to go against it.
How will suspects' solicitors be able to challenge the algorithm, if they're only given a lot of data and told this means their client is high-risk? There's a serious issue that something that's quasi-scientific is given undue weight and effectively becomes gospel. And where does this end up? Do we have algorithms making decisions in court? ''

Aurelio Peccei said in 1991 :

''In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill''

(AGENDA 21)